Firmly can say after world war two, Soviet union collapsing was the most important international political evolution in twentieth century. This evolution was the end of forty five years of cold war and bipolar system and forced the new basic conditions to the international system. Because of that a lot of scientists and researchers especially in political science field and international relations research on the failure of communism and collapse of the first practical experience of communism system in early decade 1990 and discussed different aspect of this subject. In this article tried discusses the insufficiency attention to end of the bipolar system and in this frame work cases such as nonflexible economic that based on concentrated programs, not attention to personal motivation of people in economic activities, social problems based on the distance between people and governors, lack of dynamism political of society, nonperson freedom, lose in military and scientific competition with imperialism and other things in form of communism scientific insufficiency which explained and then also these insufficiencies in theory aspects were discussed. In communism insufficiencies subject, subjects such as not attention to freedoms and its manifestation, exaggerating in proletariat role, no view in field work, faraway of rationalism no experience historical obligation (dialectical materialism) and finely disability in making a hard ideological link between nations, have been studied.

Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) was born shortly after the victory of the Russian Revolution and the establishment of Bolshevik rule in Russia. The rulers of the USSR planned to establish a government which was based on socialist doctrines in order to lead the society toward communism. In this path, it was necessary to demolish all remaining structures from Tsarist Russia and replace them with new ideologically correct establishments. In this process, the first unavoidable step was changing the culture and mentality of the Russian people and the second step was eradication of poverty and removal of exploitation through which people would be convinced of the new ruling system. One of the main areas in the creation of the appropriate bases for the new ruling system was theatre. Infact, the new ruling system played more attention to playwrights than to other artists. The central committee of the Communist party believed that it was in the power of the playwrights to disseminate the new ideology along with the ideas of its new rulers among the public and persuade them of the socialist utopia.October Revolution in Russia and victory of Marxist-Leninist ideological Revolution and establishment of Soviet Union had a great influence on all aspects of individual and social lives of the people.One of these areas of influence was establishment of a powerful and strict governmental system in the field of theater and particularly in dramaturgy (dramatic literature and playwriting). The operation of such governmental system undermined play writing during that period, so that none of the plays written within that era, in contrast with previously written plays, did not find international importance, white playwriting in this period of time should be the inheritor of fruitful, distinguished works of playwrights such as Pushkin, Chekhov, Googol and others. In this era and under the influences of the established ruling system, dramaturgy was at service of describing, deepening and bestowing legit.imacy to the ruling ideology and its promotion and thus it began its degradation. In this paper, the author has tried to infer, extract and summarize the trends and objectives dominant in the theater of that era in the form of "orders". These orders were in fact ideological instruction of the new rulers for the dramaturgy of that period. Then the author has tried to recognize and introduce those indicators prescribed by the cultural-artistic policy makers of ex-Soviet union; the instructions which led to degradation and annihilation of dramaturgy at that time. It should be mentioned that the playwrights of that Socialist Union were bound to follow such instructions in their works. "Class struggle", "particular approaches of Socialist Realism", "development of a new positive character" were some of the prescribed characteristics of that period's dramaturgy.

The guilds were one of the important economic groups, who distanced themselves from their traditional role with their widespread presence in the constitutional revolution. They were limited by government policies during the Pahlavi I period, . Tthe Tudeh party, which introduced itself as a supporter of the working classes, and attract them to the Soviet Communists, it published various newspapers such as Shahbaz, and etc. Khalq newspaper owned by Mustafa Lankarani was the organ of Jamiat Azadi Iran, which was launched in order to explain the economic conditions and problems of trade unions. By a descriptive-analytical method, this Study tries to show how the status of guilds is reflected in Khalq newspaper? . The result of the research shows that a considerable amount of articles related to this issue shows the wrong economic policy of the government in the entry of corrupt and bad goods into the country and the closure of domestic workshops, bankruptcy and poverty of guilds, which is due to the lack of a correct economic plan and the lack of coordination of economic and The production of the government created problems for the guilds, including the high cost of production raw materials, and the oppression of municipal and police officials. It has also provided solutions based on encouraging the export of goods based on barter trade with the Soviet Union in contrast to Truman's Four Principles and paying attention to the lives of villagers to increase their purchasing power in line with Soviet communist policies.

The advent of the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979 significantly worsened Iran-U.S. relations. Although this relationship has been founded upon hostility ever since, the 1984-86 period can be mentioned as one when relations between the two actors were exempt to the rule, with both sides trying to establish unofficial relationships. This article seeks to explore the reasons for U.S. proximity to Iran during those years and to answer the following question: Why did the United States pursue rapprochement with Iran in 1984-86 in spite of hostility and negative space found between the two states? The hypothesis which is proposed in this writing revolves around the discussion of fear of Communist influence in Iran; a fear that made the United States devise a plan for approaching Iran. This ultimately resulted in the Iran-Gate or Iran-Contra affair. In other words, this research seeks to test the following hypothesis: Fear of Communist influence in Iran led the United States to approach Iran in the 1984-86 period.

The leaders of the Soviet Union adopted atheist and anti-religious policies toward Muslim nations during decades of ruling over Central Asia; the polices that posed a threat to the existence of Muslims. Following the outbreak of Second World War, the government of the Soviet Union was forced to revise its hostile policies toward Muslims and establish Muslim Religious Department also known as Muftiat Department to regulate religious life of the country’s Muslims. The article’s main question is “what approaches were adopted by religious scholars to counter the threat posed by the Soviet Union against survival of the Muslim Community?” The paper shows that this group of scholars introduced Islam and Socialism as two compatible schools of thought that could coexist despite their differences.

In this paper, after some introductory notes on "communism" and on the relation between Aristotle and Plato (in section 1), we proceed to narrate briefly Aristotle's report (section 2), and his criticism (in sections 3 and 4), of the theory of family and wealth communism in Plato's philosophy. Then, we try to have a glance on this theory as it has proposed by Plato in his Republic (section 5). At the end, we endeavor, on the core of Plato's message, to assessing Aristotle's report and criticism of the theory (section 6). In the last section, while we accept Aristotle's words in a special level, we try to clear Plato of Aristotelian accusations.